Recent update

Subscribe to RSS feed

Methodologies

December 11th, 2009 by khaleddn

Methodologies

First, Quantitative Discourse Analysis

In this method, I used three music videos to try and study how viewers are reacting to the clips, when they are first posted. I chose to look at the oldest one hundred comments versus a random hundred or the latest hundred because that shows me their initial reaction of the clip. I would definitely want to have the first reaction and opinion of viewers, because the latest comments could be out dated and not near the time of when the music video was first out and what people’s fresh thought’s were on it.

When I was looking for music videos to do my studies, not all of them had enough commentary to study. I had to choose certain songs that had enough commentary, that was in english for me to have in my research. Another set of choices, I had to make, were what categories I will have for my quantitative analysis.

I had to include a category that allows positive, negative or neutral comments for todays as well as ones for the past. From overviewing the comments, I realized many people mention the young Lil’ Bow Wow, and were comparing him to what he became, now. Another important category to have was the ‘Other’ section. Other would include anything like, comments that do not necessarily mean anything e.g. “15 cents” (Youtube.com Comment 1, 2009), people arguing with each other e.g. “Megababy0825 r u retarded? it’s ment to be spelt Soulja idiot” (Youtube.com Comment 2, 2009), people who express envy e.g. “he should had let me b n that video i look better then all dem lil girlz” (Youtube.com Comment 3, 2009) and anything else that doesn’t fall under a clear positive or negative category about the content in the music videos without personal agendas, like envy. The difference between ‘Other’ and ‘Neutral’ is that neutral  comments relate to the actual clip, whether they are general questions or facts; ‘Other’ could be general information which does not relate to the clip and would also include things like arguing or conversations.

I included Neutral, in there because there were general comments with no opinion like, “I think 8 years old he started rappin’ or 6 or 5 or 3 he started rhymin’ he was known when he was 13” (Youtube.com Comment 4, 2009). With all these categories, the same comment could fall under two categories at the same time, which has happened quite often. An example would be, “I miss Lil’ Bow Wow…too bad he had to grow up and become Boo Wow!” (Youtube.com Comment 5, 2009). This comment would fall under the categories, ‘His History’ as a positive and also, ‘Bad’ for him currently.

The limitations that I faced with this study is that I wasn’t sure exactly what the age group was of the people commenting. From the slang language used and Bow Wow’s younger fan base, we can be on the safe side about, most of the people commentating are in their teenage years or early twenties, but there is no solid evidence to prove this.

The first music video’s commentary I looked at was his first single, when he was thirteen years old. It is called “Bounce With Me” and received many comments on the young Lil’ Bow Wow; yet these comments are only one year ago, when the video was posted. As you can see in the table, out of one hundred comments, as well as out of 100 percent, the most comments received were 33 past positive comments and 32 present-day positive comments. That is a third positive comments about his initial clip and many of them addressed how cute he was and their great memories of it, when it first came out.

The second music video I looked at was, “Take Ya Home”. It came out in 2002, before Lil’ Bow Wow, changed his stage name to Bow Wow. The video here was posted two years ago and the last one hundred comments are two years old. As you can see the majority of the results were present-day positive ones of 55 percent versus only ten percent of present-day negative comments.

The final video clip I reviewed the commentary for was, “Marco Polo” featuring Soulja Boy (very well known hip hop artist of today). This music video was released in 2008 and posted that year. The last hundred comments here are a year old. You will find that the majority, thirty percent, of the results here were found in ‘Other’ and in the present day positive category. The reason for this was because many people were arguing about the song and attacking it as well as the artists in it. This also explains why the second highest percentage, twenty nine percent, was the negative commentary, from the attacks. There was hardly any positive commentary except for the fans who were defending the artists from all the verbal attacks they were getting, this fell into other, because they weren’t clear positive comments. It was basically answering back and saying things like, everyone is jealous of the artists. This music video was very sexual and cheap in concept and low in class, in many people’s opinions, which is what created all the controversy. Fans were not impressed at all with this clip because of its repetitive shallow scenes; nor were they to happy about the song and lyrics, because of its empty meaning.

Second, In-Depth Video Analysis

I carried out an in-depth video analysis, studying what content these music videos had and what behavior was seen in them. To do this study, I can connect what people mean by their comments with what they’re seeing. Why people are resistant to these scenes and what provoked all the arguments that took place on the commentary walls.

“Bounce With Me” in-depth analysis:

“Bow Wow-Bounce With Me”, posted 2008 on Youtube.com

Overall, there are many young girls in the music video acting their age by playing outside and dancing without any sexual gestures or insinuations (this should be the norm). Yet there had to be behavior of sex appeal with the first woman in slow motion, being slightly sprayed with the sprinklers and sexually watching the camera. There is some footage which relates to minor violence in the clip and a lot of gesturing of wealth.

He has many older male role models, in the clip, showing their support and adding to Lil’ Bow Wow’s popularity in the clip. He has an older rapper featured in his song, which puts him in a more mature perspective. This is a more innocent music video that suits his age in comparison to his other music videos. This is considered PG 13 it’s song is created for a family movie, “Big Momma’s House”.

“Take Ya Home” In-Depth Analysis:

“Lil Bow Wow – Take Ya Home (Official Music Video)”, posted 2007 on Youtube.com

There is repeated sexual imagery here from numerous older women. It is inappropriate yet is treated as though it was normal for a young boy to be wanted by older women. Women who portray a facade of perfection.

“Marco Polo” In-Depth Analysis

“Bow Wow & Soulja Boy Tell ‘Em – Marco Polo [Music Video]“, posted 2008 on Youtube.com

Many women in bikinis being objectified and represent perfection throughout the music video. The artists pay no respect to the women or other people in the clip and take an authoritative stance, by standing on a higher platform and talking down at them, in the beach waters. You could see here that Bow Wow is covered in tattoos, to make him look more raw and “gangsta”; this is a part of his new, grown up look.

Posted in Uncategorized | | 0 Comments

Leave a reply


 

Bad Behavior has blocked 36 access attempts in the last 7 days.